Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has expressed his concerns about Elon Musk’s recent wave of Twitter censorship. In response to a post praising Musk, Buterin said that he would rather see Twitter provide users with 30 days’ notice before implementing new content moderation rules.
co-founder of Ethereum, has raised concerns about Elon Musk’s recent wave of Twitter censorship. In a tweet, Buterin said that the site’s “barrage of account bans” over the past few days is putting Twitter on a “path to authoritarianism.”
Buterin specifically pointed to the recent bans of accounts that track Elon Musk’s private jet and those that criticize the billionaire. He argued that these bans are “really bad” and that they “veer too close to the style of actions of the previous Twitter administration that people justifiably rebelled against.”
Buterin’s comments come as Musk has faced increasing scrutiny for his handling of Twitter since he acquired the company in October. Critics have accused Musk of censorship and of using his position to promote his own personal interests.
It remains to be seen how Musk will respond to Buterin’s criticisms. However, Buterin’s comments are a sign of the growing concerns about Musk’s plans for Twitter.
In response to a post praising Elon Musk, Vitalik Buterin said that Musk was deploying a strategy that he calls “central planning as overfitting.” This means that Musk is introducing policies that are tailored to very specific situations, rather than considering the broader implications of his actions.
Buterin argues that this is a dangerous approach, as it can lead to unintended consequences. He points to the recent example of Twitter, where Musk has banned a number of accounts, including those that track his private jet. Buterin argues that this is a form of censorship, and that it sets a dangerous precedent.
Buterin’s comments are a reminder that even the most well-intentioned leaders can make mistakes. It is important to be critical of any new policies or initiatives, and to consider the potential consequences before they are implemented.
The latest wave of censorship concerns began when Elon Musk banned the accounts @ElonJets and @CelebJets. These accounts tracked the movements of Elon Musk’s and other celebrities’ private jets, respectively. They did so by pulling publicly available information and reposting it, which is legal in the United States.
Musk’s decision to ban these accounts has been met with criticism from some, who argue that it is a form of censorship. They point out that the information that these accounts were tracking was publicly available, and that Musk’s decision to ban them was based on his personal dislike of them.
Others have defended Musk’s decision, arguing that he is within his rights to ban accounts that he does not like. They also argue that the information that these accounts were tracking could be used to track and harass celebrities.
It remains to be seen whether Musk will continue to ban accounts that he does not like. However, his decision to ban @ElonJets and @CelebJets has raised concerns about his commitment to free speech on Twitter.
Elon Musk saw the ElonJets Twitter bot as a threat to his personal privacy and safety. He banned the account, and then went one step further by banning the personal account of Jack Sweeney, the creator of the bot. Musk then quickly implemented a new Twitter policy that bans any tweets or accounts that share someone’s live location. The only exceptions are in relation to a crisis situation to assist with humanitarian efforts or in relation to public engagement events.
Musk’s actions have been met with mixed reactions. Some people have praised him for taking steps to protect his privacy, while others have criticized him for censorship. It remains to be seen how Musk’s new policy will be enforced, and whether it will have a chilling effect on free speech on Twitter.
Elon Musk has been backpedaling on his previous statements about free speech on Twitter. He has banned accounts that track his private jet, and he has censored links to Mastodon, a competing social media website.
Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, has criticized Musk’s actions. He said that banning things in response to catalysts is the path to authoritarianism. He also said that censoring Mastodon is “really bad.”
It is unclear why Musk is banning Mastodon links. However, it is possible that he is trying to stifle competition. Mastodon is a decentralized social media platform, which means that it is not controlled by any one company. This could pose a threat to Twitter, which is a centralized social media platform.
Musk’s actions have raised concerns about his commitment to free speech on Twitter. It remains to be seen how he will balance free speech with other concerns, such as privacy and safety.
Buterin has said that “good policy should be decided behind a veil of ignorance first, applied second.” This means that policies should be made without considering the personal biases or experiences of the people who are making them. Instead, policies should be made based on what is best for everyone, regardless of their individual circumstances.
Buterin has also suggested that Twitter should provide users with a month’s notice before bringing any new content moderation rules into effect. This would give users time to adjust to the new rules and to provide feedback.
It is important to note that these are just Buterin’s preferences. Not everyone agrees with him. However, his views are worth considering, especially as Twitter continues to evolve.
